And then, because apparently I was having a busy day, I saw Adaptation. It’s… it’s quite a movie. It’s a movie about the screenwriter’s struggle to write the screenplay adaptation of a book about flowers, which is really a loosely connected set of essays and personal thoughts. His goal is to not impose any Hollywood crap onto his adaptation, but instead remain as true to it as possible. The problem he discovers is that it’s impossible to write a movie without a plot, or themes, or events, or characters that grow and change. And… it’s almost impossible to talk about it in more depth without spoiling things. I shall say now that I really enjoyed it a lot, that I was laughing almost constantly, but that it probably isn’t the kind of movie that I’d want to watch over and over again.

So, it’s like this. Our screenwriter has a twin brother, right? who also wants to be a screenwriter, but who wants nothing more than to sell out, Hollywood-style. His brother also has all of the extroversion and social courage of the pair. In short, he’s everything Charlie wishes he could be.The further into the movie I got, the harder it was for me to believe that the book or the brother existed at all. Well, I was half-right. Charlie’s brother is a figment representing Charlie’s struggle to choose his place in the world. Not only that, but as soon as he starts listening to his brother, the film instantly shifts direction from the most impressive meta-movie in history to standard Hollywood schlock, with drugs, guns, sex, and car chases. But even this is switched in so slyly, shell-game style, that I had to enjoy the con.

However, the book. The book is real, and Charlie being hired to adapt the book into a movie is real, and the woman who wrote the book is real. Everything in the first half of the movie (well, basically everything) really does seem to have happened just the way it’s written. And so, when the second half shears so abruptly into fiction, I’m left feeling a little bit dirty about the way the real people were used. I’m sure it was approved and all, but it’s just so strange. And that impresses me most of all, as I consider myself fairly jaded these days.

7 thoughts on “Adaptation.

  1. Jason

    When you say that the people were real, and that they were used, I’m fully unclear what you’re talking about. Help?

  2. Chris

    There are approximately zero fictional characters in the movie, and they are placed in a non-zero number of fictional and essentially slanderous situations. He made up insulting shit about real people.

  3. Chris

    I am 99.9% sure he made it up, probably higher, and as I said above: I’m sure it got approval, but it’s still creepy. You’d have to see it to understand why, I think.

  4. Jason

    Anyway, yeah, it doesn’t seem bothersome at all. Clearly, they were ok with it. Isn’t it cool how wackykooky he is?

  5. Skwid

    I loved the mind job of this one. It’s just exquisite. But you’re right, I don’t see it as one I’d watch again, at least not for a good long while.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.